Recommendations, connect with, and you can candidate sex when you look at the U

Recommendations, connect with, and you can candidate sex when you look at the U

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Beyond self-report: Playing with latency to answer model issue reacting techniques on the web-based public opinion surveys,” on Sourcebook getting Political Communications Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , R. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo College student

102 . Oxley , chilean beautiful women Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Governmental thinking are different that have mental faculties,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is actually female likely to choose getting women’s things expenses than its men associates?” Legislative Knowledge Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Women Make: The insurance policy Perception of women during the Congress ( il : University from Chicago Push , 2002 ).Yahoo Scholar

105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “Emblematic speeches on You.S. Senate and their representational implications,” Diary off Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks show blacks and feminine depict female? Good contingent ‘yes’,” Diary regarding Politics 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related governmental studies and descriptive logo of women,” Political Choices 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle College student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be a ‘gender attraction effect’ into the Western politics? S. Household elections,” Governmental Research Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This particular article might have been cited by the pursuing the guides. So it listing is established predicated on study available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and you can Crave, Ellen 2015. Could it possibly be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A role Congruity Idea out-of Candidate Electability inside the Transitional Tunisia. Perspectives into Politics, Vol. 13, Topic. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. Just who stereotypes feminine people? Determining personal differences in female stereotype reliance. Government, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 3, Topic. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The latest part off gender for the descriptive representation,” Political Research Quarterly 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Younger Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever women attack. Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 34, Thing. 1, p. 44.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering blended signals: new character away from gender and you can partisanship from inside the feedback of politicians. Record out of Elections, Public-opinion and you may Functions, Vol. twenty six, Situation. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Center and (No) Attention? How Recipients Adversely Infer Missing Facts about People in politics and just how It Has an effect on the Assessment of your Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Situation. 7, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Thinking of Women Political figures: The case out-of Poland. Politics for the Central European countries, Vol. fourteen, Material. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Societal Character Concept into the Study of Gender from inside the Government. Political Therapy, Vol. 40, Thing. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunshine Younger and you may Baek, Younger Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence to your Female Politicians: As to why Ambivalence Matters to have Gender Equality in a beneficial Democracy. Log of women, Government & Plan, Vol. forty, Procedure. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Murder and you can Women in Government. Corvinus Record out-of Globally Products, Vol. 4, Point. step one, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leadership throughout the News: Gender Bias from inside the Chief Stereotypes during the Strategy and you can Program Minutes. Uk Record away from Political Science, Vol. fifty, Point. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How can Owners Assess Path?Peak Bureaucrats’ Passion and you will Ability? Good Typology and you can Shot. Public Government Remark, Vol. 80, Procedure. cuatro, p. 532.

Bir yanıt yazın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir